Parallel Paths: Exploring the Evolution of Environment and Women’s Rights

Introduction

This article explores the evolution of nature's restorative power and draws an analogous relationship with the struggle for women’s rights. An ecofeminist view of environmental rights tells us how the exploitation of nature is not starkly different from that of women. Coined by  French feminist Françoise d’Eaubonne in 1974, ecofeminism connects the commitment to environmental conservation with the feminist movement. It encompasses within its analysis how both women and nature have been the subject of patriarchal capitalism. This article explores such a connection through three broad categories: how the exploitation began, the forms of retaliation against the oppression, and finally the restoration of autonomy to both.

The Common Exploitation of Nature and Women

The exploitation of nature and women share profound connections that underscore the intricate ways in which societal power dynamics manifest across seemingly distinct domains. The commodification of women is a manifestation of the intricate web of capitalism, where individuals, driven by economic incentives, often find themselves reduced to their perceived marketable attributes. In an article by Stephen A. Mrowzki titled ‘Colonization and Commodification of Nature’, the author discusses how European colonization linked with capitalism has led to an increased use of abstract space on Earth. The author narrates, how with the growth of capitalism, there has been an increment in several spaces being invaded under the garb of material conquests which then translated to the political power of Europe. Overall, the article explores how European colonization and the growth of capitalism contributed to the commodification of nature, with a focus on the abstracting of land and the treatment of people as commodities.

Both women and nature have endured objectification, a process that reduces their intrinsic worth. Women are often objectified on the basis of their physical attributes and reproductive capabilities and are forced to bear the brunt of nurturing, similar to the role we have denigrated nature to. This objectification diminishes their intrinsic value and reinforces a harmful mindset that prioritizes control and dominance over nurturing and respect.

Economic exploitation further underscores these parallels. Women have faced historical marginalization and underpayment in the workforce, mirroring the unsustainable extraction of natural resources for immediate financial gain. An excellent example of this is explored in an article by Liliana Acero, where she discusses the commodification of women's bodies in the context of trafficking for prostitution and egg donation. It argues that these practices contribute to the subordination of women and the subsequent exploitation of their labour power.

In both cases, short-term economic interests often take precedence over long-term interests of well-being. Consequently, this exacerbates environmental degradation, with practices like deforestation and pollution disproportionately affecting vulnerable communities, including tribal communities that depend on the environment for purposes of livelihood and sustenance. These patterns of exploitation stem from colonialist and patriarchal systems and have historically dispossessed indigenous peoples of their land and resources, while simultaneously oppressing women within societal hierarchies. This intertwined history demonstrates the symbiotic relationship between patriarchy and environmental degradation, with both prioritising domination and control over nurturing and sustaining.

Retaliation: Feminist Movement and Natural Calamities

Through the waves of feminism and a series of natural calamities, women and nature have demonstrated remarkable resilience and retaliation against the oppression and exploitation that they have endured. The first wave of feminism, focusing on suffrage and legal rights, marked the beginning of women's reclamation of her agency, and parallels nature's versatile adaptability after environmental disasters. In the second wave, women confronted issues like workplace discrimination and reproductive rights, asserting themselves in a manner similar to nature's adaptive strategies in the face of adversity. The third wave of feminism introduced intersectionality and recognized the unique challenges faced by marginalized women, much like nature's adaptation to the complex challenges posed by climate change. In the emerging fourth wave, technology and social media continue to amplify feminist voices, mirroring nature's innovative survival strategies. Furthermore, natural calamities like hurricanes and wildfires have placed an immense pressure on ecosystems, compelling society to exhibit resilience through artificial adaptive techniques such as drought-resistant plants and disaster-resistant mechanisms.

Intersectional feminism acknowledges that women's experiences vary based on race, class, and sexual orientation, and mirrors the recognition accepted in environmental justice movements that marginalized communities often bear the brunt of ecological exploitation and natural disasters. Climate feminism, a subset of feminism, underscores the profound connection between climate change and gender inequality, and highlights the disproportionate impact of environmental degradation on both women and nature. In essence, women and nature's shared journey toward resilience and retaliation underscores their interconnected struggle for justice and sustainability and demonstrates their enduring capacity to adapt, regenerate, and unite against oppression and exploitation.

Activism and Restoration of Rights

Climate change activism, embodied by figures like Greta Thunberg, depicts for us the response to the subsequent retaliation by the environment in the form of natural calamities through human intervention and draws a parallel to feminist movements striving for various manifestations of gender equality. Ecosystem restoration initiatives, including reforestation and coral reef rehabilitation, are various methods that help to recover and restore the environment to its vitality, analogous to the accommodation made for women in several public spaces and positions of power. The Environment Protection Act of 1986 illustrates this, with the point of effort made to resolve the catastrophic effects of activities like deforestation through legislation.

Movements advocating for women's rights and environmental conservation frequently find common ground, recognising that the exploitation of both women and nature is interconnected and must be addressed holistically. Through such a conceptualization of ecofeminism, women have been instrumental in environmental activism, highlighting the intersectionality of gender and environmental issues. This collective effort of environmentalism and feminism underscores the importance of dismantling patriarchal and capitalist systems that perpetuate exploitation in all its forms. Ultimately, understanding the parallels between the exploitation of women and nature is fundamental in shaping comprehensive solutions that respect the intrinsic value of both and pave the way for a more just and sustainable world.

Source: shutterstock.com